Performance and handling
There isn’t much to choose between the two cars in terms of engine performance on the paper, with hardly any difference in the engine specs and output figures. In the real world, however, the Figo is marginally quicker, not just through the gears, but in overtaking acceleration (single gear) as well. The difference in the sprint and roll on timings of the two cars, however, is marginal and won’t make the kind of difference that should leave someone cribbing.
The more perceptible difference, however, is in the handling department where the Figo scores highly. Both cars run on 175mm wide 14 inch wheels. However, with a 65 mm profile against the Micra’s 70mm, the Figo runs on slightly thinner tyres. That, along with a superbly set up suspension offers great poise when the car is thrown around the corners. The taut feel of the car, the tactile steering, and the solid, sturdy feel inspire confidence as you hold the car by its neck. The Figo really behaves around corners, and holds its line like a few others in its class.
The Micra too doesn’t really have any problems as regards poise and confidence. It’s just that, riding on a softer setup, it feels a bit squidgy around the bends. The Micra’s steering too is a tad light and the overall feel of the car isn’t as taut and sturdy as the Figo
Ford Figo
3rd gear 40-80 km/h
11.2s
4th gear 40-80 km/h
17.8s
Acceleration
0-60km/h 6.09s
0-100km/h 15.32s
Nissan Micra
3rd gear 40-80km/h
11.8 seconds
4th gear 40-80km/h
17.86 seconds
Acceleration
0-60km/h 6.3 seconds
0-100km/h 16.1 seconds
when shown the twisties. We would have to rate a Figo slightly higher than the Micra here
Page 5 of 7 Go to next page for ‘fuel efficiency’